there Washington Court of Appeals Confirm “Mask order” towards Trump card. As part of the procedures in which he is accused of wanting to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential elections, the former President of the United States will not be able to “Talking about witnesses, prosecutors, court staff and their families” In treatment. The appeal by the businessman’s lawyers – who invoked the First Amendment regarding freedom of expression – was rejected, but a change was made: Donald will be able to express himself against special prosecutor Jack Smith or against President Joe Biden.
According to what the judges – Patricia Millett, Nina Billard and Bradley Garcia – held, Trump stands by his speech “Real-time, real-world consequences.” Which They threaten the integrity of the process Which will start on March 4, 2024: “It was the court’s duty to act proactively to prevent the creation of an atmosphere of fear or intimidation with the aim of preventing trial participants and staff from carrying out their duties within the trial.”.
The judges stressed that the countryside Trump for the 2024 presidential election “It does not change the court’s obligation or duty to ensure the fair administration of justice in criminal cases […] “Mr. Trump is a former president and current presidential candidate, and there is strong public interest in what he has to say.”. The court’s reasoning is clear: the 77-year-old should be tried under the same procedures as other Americans:“This is the meaning of the rule of law”.
In its ruling, the appeals court highlighted the former president’s numerous public statements and attacks against witnesses in the case, including former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and former Vice President Mike Pence. The court stated that such statements“Represents a great danger” That witnesses are intimidated e “unjustifiably affected” in case. And again some witnesses “They saw their lives turned upside down after ending up in Trump’s verbal crosshairs.”. There is a risk for witnesses, which has been defined as largely irreversible in the Internet age: “Once an individual has been publicly targeted, even rescinding the offending statement cannot eliminate subsequent threats, harassment, or other effects of intimidation during the pretrial and trial phases of this case.”.
As highlighted CNNThis is the second time in days that the appeals court has reimposed restrictions on what Trump can say in public. The former president also ended up under restrictions in New York, where judges barred him from attacking court employees in his civil fraud trial. The businessman can still file further appeals against the mask, including before the Supreme Court.
“Reader. Travel maven. Student. Passionate tv junkie. Internet ninja. Twitter advocate. Web nerd. Bacon buff.”
